Women Deserve Better

Recently, a study was released by Jamie Bryan Hall and Ryan T. Anderson of the Ethics and Public Policy Center concerning the safety of mifepristone which is a one of two medications used for medical abortions in the United States. Mifepristone is a compound that binds with high affinity to progesterone receptors in the human body thus blocking natural progesterone from binding to the receptors and leading to fetal demise because progesterone is needed for fetal development. The second drug administered 24-48 hours after taking mifepristone is misoprostol which causes cervical softening and uterine contractions resulting in expulsion of the products of conception. In 2000, during the Clinton Administration, the FDA approved mifepristone for medical abortions after small clinical trials (859 U.S. participants) under a strict Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) that required three IN-PERSON office visits, physician only prescribing, only in-clinic administration of medications, mandatory reporting of ALL serious adverse events, and physicians had to be able to quickly access surgical and emergency care. In 2016, during the Obama Administration, REMS was relaxed – in-person visits lowered from three to one, extension of gestational limit from 7 to 10 weeks, in-office administration of medication was removed, and adverse event reporting was no longer required except under specific circumstances. In 2023, during the Biden Administration, REMS was lowered even further – no in-person visits required and telehealth permitted, mail order pharmacies allowed to dispense abortion medication, non-physician healthcare providers permitted to prescribe, and the only adverse event required to be reported is death. The Hall/Anderson study was a review of insurance claims made within 45 days following 865,727 mifepristone abortions performed during 2017-2023. Examination of the insurance data showed an alarming number of serious adverse event claims – hemorrhage, emergency room visit related to the abortion, repeated surgical abortion, infection, abortion related hospitalization, ectopic pregnancy, transfusion, sepsis, and several other emergency events – of 10.93%. The FDA drug label for mifepristone reports the serious adverse event rate as < 0.5% based on the small scale clinical research done in a tightly controlled environment for the 2000 drug approval. We now have large scale, real world data indicating that mifepristone is not as safe as is being touted by the abortion industry. Additionally, a medication with a 10% risk of a serious adverse event is being sold with no in-person office visit or in-person post medical procedure follow up. An absolute recipe for disaster. The FDA should pull mifepristone from the market.

Action Alert: Call on Congress and the FDA to Pull the Dangerous Abortion Pill

The Abortion Pill Harms Women

New Study Reveals Chemical Abortions Are 22 Times More Dangerous Than the FDA Admits

doctordeplorablemf

From the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

On May 1, 2025, The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released a 409 page document titled “Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria – Review of Evidence and Best Practices.” On reviewing the document, I was pleased that the findings confirmed what the CASS Report from the United Kingdom pointed out last year leading to a retraction of some aggressive “gender affirming” treatments in parts of Europe. There is scant evidence backing what the World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH) has been pushing as standard of care for gender dysphoria treatment in children (age < 18 years old). There is very little out there in the scientific literature universe as to the long term effects of suppressing puberty with puberty blockers or giving cross sex hormones for the development of secondary sexual characteristics not aligned with one’s biological sex in the pediatric population. Back in the day, medical school for me was 1986-1990 and residency training 1990-1994, there were three groups one treated where extreme caution was exercised – children, pregnant women, and the elderly (age > 65). It is shocking to me that over the span of 35 years, professional medical organizations have been co-opted by identity politics and the pharmaceutical industry. The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the Endocrine Society, and many other medical organizations are howling that the report advocates “conversion therapy.”

HHS Releases Comprehensive Review of Medical Interventions for Children and Adolescents with Gender Dysphoria

Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria

HHS Releases Damning Report on ‘Gender-Affirming Care’

doctordeplorablemf

Gender Dysphoria is a mental illness and should NOT be treated with cross sex hormones and puberty blockers

Today’s topic is Transgender Moonbattery.

1. In the State of Ohio. The Ohio 10th District Court comprised of 8 judges who are all Democrats, with three judges presiding in unanimous agreement on this week’s H.B. 68 ruling, is elected entirely by registered voters in Franklin County – so no surprise here with the Marxist, ignorant, activism. H.B. 68 was passed after a DeWine veto last year. H.B. 68 – known as the SAFE ACT (Save Adolescents from Experimentation Act) was combined with H.B. 6 (SAVE WOMEN’S SPORTS ACT). In their ruling this week, the Ohio 10th District Court ruled part of H.B. 68 unconstitutional. H.B. 68 banned both medical and surgical transgender treatments in minors and banned biological males from competing in women’s sports. The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) – I want to blow paper spit wads through a paper straw at my television set every time I see an advertisement on TV from these clowns and Real America’s Voice has been killing me with ACLU ads lately, but hey, the cost of free speech – filed the lawsuit and the ACLU only sought a ruling on medical treatment – not surgical treatment or the sport’s ban. The judges in this case bought lock, stock, and barrel all the yet to be proven bull feces spewed forth by the medical establishment. Of note, there are no good studies out there verifying that hormonal and puberty blocker treatments in individuals < 18 years of age are reversible. Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost and several other Red State Attorney Generals (see 9/27/2024 post on this site) signed and sent a letter to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) last September warning the AAP that they may be in violation of state consumer protection laws by stating that effects of puberty blockers in children are “reversible.” This case is now headed to the Ohio Supreme Court and we will now get to see why judicial elections are exceptionally important.

Appeals court overturns Ohio law banning trans healthcare for minors

Appellate court rules Ohio’s ban on gender transition treatment for minors unconstitutional

Ohio Court Allows Transgender Procedures On Kids to Resume

2. Transgender tomfoolery from sea to shining sea.

Trans Air Force sergeants take Trump admin to court, say it’s ‘not possible’ to serve as women

Illinois Dem Rep says school girls allegedly being forced to change in front of male in locker room is ‘a lie’

Judicial Coup: Biden Judge Blocks Trump’s Transgender Military Ban

SICK! Mother Of 13-Yr-Old Girl Is Bullied By Trans Activists At School Board Meeting For Demanding Biological-Sex Locker Rooms After School Adminstrators Tried To Force Her Daughter To Undress In Front of Trans Kid

Former Soccer Star Megan Rapinoe Slams ‘Depraved’ Trump Over Ban on Men in Women’s Sports: ‘This Isn’t an Issue’

Trump’s VA Just Crushed the Trans Agenda – Redirects Funds to Disabled Veterans

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Colorado Case on Conversion Therapy

The Trans Trend Trundles On

Senate Democrats block GOP-led bill to ban transgender athletes from women’s sports

Media Hugely Inflated Number of Transgender Troops

doctordeplorablemf

I’ll take the dude, please

Watching Pete Hegseth get grilled yesterday was popcorn time. I give him credit for being a cool little Fonzi and not taking the bait. During my career; as a women, I absolutely hated working for women. Watching female Democrat Senators scream down at Hegseth gave me great joy that I am now retired and don’t have to deal with implacable women trying to get ahead in the workforce anymore. Hegseth brought up an excellent point. Combat personnel should be top notch and able to pass a grueling physical fitness exam. If a woman can meet the same standards set for a man, then she makes the team. Lowering standards for women so they pass the exam puts the whole team at risk. Men and women do have different body builds (fat/muscle content) and strength characteristics. Can women pass the physical fitness test set for men – maybe a few. Truth be told, if I were in a foxhole behind enemy lines right now and I had a choice as to who I would be sharing the foxhole with – dude or dudette – I would pick the dude. Do women have a place in the military and a valuable skill set to add – yes – but not as frontline combatants if they can’t pass the same physical fitness standards as men.

The Democrats Humiliated Themselves in the Hegseth Hearing

Pete Hegseth Makes The Definitive Case Why He’s Qualified To Be Trump’s Defense Secretary

doctordeplorablemf