Iran’s Re-emergence in Global Terrorism and Advancement in Nuclear Capabilities: A Growing Concern

In recent years, Iran has re-emerged as a significant player on the global stage not just for its oil reserves and strategic location but for its role in supporting terrorist organizations and sponsoring attacks worldwide. This involvement has exacerbated tensions complicating international relations and security across various continents. Iran’s ties with terrorist groups can be traced back to the aftermath of the 1979 Iranian Revolution which led to the establishment of the Islamic Republic. The new regime, driven by a revolutionary zeal to export its theocratic ideology, found common cause with like-minded groups across the Middle East. Hezbollah in Lebanon, the most notable among Iran’s proxies, was founded in the early 1980s with substantial Iranian support and has since been involved in numerous terrorist activities. Iran’s support for terrorism is multifaceted encompassing financial, logistical, and military backing. U.S. officials and various international bodies have repeatedly pointed out Iran’s role in funding and arming groups designated as terrorist organizations including Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. This support extends beyond the Middle East to parts of Africa and Latin America where Iran’s Quds Force—the overseas arm of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps—has been active. The consequences of Iran’s actions are profound and far-reaching. Terrorist attacks allegedly backed by Iran have occurred in places as diverse as Argentina, Bulgaria, and Thailand claiming innocent lives and destabilizing regions. Moreover, Iran’s engagement in proxy wars in Syria and Yemen has contributed to prolonged conflicts and humanitarian crises in those areas. The global community’s response to Iran’s activities has been mixed. While some countries advocate for stringent sanctions and a tougher stance against Iran, others call for diplomacy and dialogue.

So why the re-emergence of activity in sponsoring terrorist activities?

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly referred to as the “Iran nuclear deal,” was a 2015 agreement between the US, Iran, and the EU to restrict Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for relief of international sanctions on Iran. The Trump administration pulled out of the agreement in 2018 and re-imposed sanctions as the administration described the deal as a horrible one-sided deal that should have never been made. The re-imposing of the sanctions was done to get Iran to agree to a better deal. Under the sanctions, the Iranian economy crumbled and the funding for terrorist activities decreased. The sanctions were working. The EU; however, got squeamish and began to openly oppose the sanctions. After Biden came into office, the sanctions were waived and over ten billion dollars in frozen Iranian assets were released. Now with sanctions removed and assets unfrozen, Iran kick-started its nuclear programs and its support and sponsoring of terrorist activities. The middle east is currently on fire and Biden is eating ice cream on the beach in Delaware and Harris is cackling away and telling Iran “Don’t.” Iran refrained from making any missteps when Trump was around because Iran knew Trump would not play games – deterrence by STRENGTH policy. Now the US is seen as weak and no longer a superpower. The world needs someone who can change the direction away from nuclear war and decrease Iran’s support and sponsorship of terrorist activities. Trump is that someone.

Iran Inching Toward Nuclear Weapons Breakout

When Sanctions Worked – Iran

Siberhusk

The Cost of Going Green

For families already facing financial hardship, Kamala Harris promises to lower energy costs, but her plan could bring more harm than relief as evidenced by states like California which are led by her party. On Harris’ campaign site, she mentions reducing energy costs but immediately pivots to addressing the “climate crisis.” Data from the Heritage Foundation highlights a striking trend: of the sixteen states where electricity costs exceed the national average, only two (Alaska, New Hampshire) are led by Republicans. The states governed by Democrats have implemented aggressive renewable energy mandates.

Prohibitive costs stem from policies in blue states that push for renewable energy with many states requiring 15% or more of their electricity come from “clean” (solar, wind, hydro) sources by 2035. Several states also aim to have 100% of car sales be electric vehicles (EVs) by 2035. This embrace of the climate agenda by blue states has significant financial implications for residents. The disparity in energy costs is evident with Californians paying three times what residents in Louisiana do. This is just the beginning—once renewable mandates and the increased demand for electricity due to EV adoption and other technological advancements take full effect, costs could skyrocket further. Rising energy costs also affect businesses which pass those expenses onto consumers making the overall cost of living in blue states significantly higher. Gasoline prices tell a similar story with California’s prices far exceeding those in states like Florida because of California’s higher taxes and regulations. What do residents in these states receive in return for their higher bills? The answer, it seems, is little to nothing. Politicians in these states pass environmental policies that drive up costs for working families without significantly impacting the global climate. Even if all U.S. states went 100% renewable, it would barely make a dent in global carbon emissions because of the massive emissions produced by China and India who are not active players in the climate crisis game. The key question remains: why do lawmakers in these blue states persist with policies that hurt their own residents? And why do voters continue to accept it? Harris’ clean energy/climate change agenda could spread these energy policies nationwide making this a critical issue for voters to consider in November.

Wake up, folks. If Harris gets “elected” in November, our “standard of living climate” is going to change dramatically.

Call It Greenflation — And Kamala Wants More Of It

Harris-Walz: Joy and Freedom – or Misery and Tyranny?

Kamala’s Silence on Energy Policy Is Deafening

Siberhusk

The U.S. interest payments on the national debt

It has happened. The U.S. Federal Government now spends more per month servicing its debt ($140 billion) than on any other expense – more than Social Security ($129 billion), Dept. of Health and Human Services ($90 billion), Dept. of Education ($87 billion) and the Dept. of Defense ($63 billion). On an annualized basis, the interest debt payment is approaching $1.2 trillion and is increasing rapidly. The nation is drowning in debt and interest payments are like an anchor around the country’s neck. If you or I were spending more than we brought in, we could cut our expenses or borrow money and keep on spending until the bank says NO and we declare bankruptcy. The government; however, can issue more money (expand the money supply) through the Federal Reserve to pay off the debt and interest. Unfortunately, printing money devalues the currency. One dollar in 2021 is worth about 80 cents today. This cycle creates a self perpetuating doom loop – you borrow money to pay interest on borrowed money which results in total debt growing not in a linear fashion but exponentially. Politicians are loath to cut spending and constituents are not keen on belt tightening. Much like the Titanic on the night of April 14, 1912, the United States of America is on course for some tragic rough sea navigation.

The Debt Spiral Crosses the Point of No Return

Endgame: Interest On US Debt Surpasses $1 Trillion For First Time Ever, Exploding August Budget Deficit To Record High

World’s Top Banker Confesses He’s Deeply Concerned

Siberhusk

Consequences of the Harris/Biden Economic Policies

Retail store closings and bankruptcies have soared under Harris/Biden as Harris weaves an “everything is just peachy keen” yarn. Decline in the retail sector is due to economic factors such as inflation, higher interest rates and a substantial rise in retail theft. Restaurants are also closing as customers have decided to stay home. Increased energy, rent and food costs have resulted in menu prices that are out of reach for many customers. 2024 is on target to see a 40% increase in closings over 2023. Biden’s economic policies were dubbed “Bidenomics.” As part of her marketing game and image makeover, Harris has titled her policy “Opportunity Economics.” The reality mathematical equation for Biden Policy vs. Harris Policy is Bidenomics = Opportunity Economics. The Everyday Joe Blow equation for all this policy JOY is “same shit, different day.”

Largest Retail Store and Restaurant Closings for 2024:
Dollar Tree\Family Dollar 620
Rite Aid 165
Big Lots 300
Macy’s 55
Red Lobster 93
CVS 315
Walgreens 77
Foot Locker 36
7-Eleven 272
99 Cents Only 371
Rue21 543
LL Flooring 94
Conn’s Home Plus 170

Bankruptcies
99 Cents Only
Rue21
Rite Aid
Big Lots
Red Lobster

US Store Closings Outstrip Openings in Break From Past Two Years

Retail Bloodbath: More Than 2,600 Store Closings Have Been Announced So Far In 2024

Macy’s Set To Close 55 Stores By The End Of 2024

Siberhusk

The Centrist American Makeover of a Dull Far-left Presidential Candidate

Of all the tools in the Democrat tool box, why was Kamala Harris chosen as the 2024 Presidential Candidate? Vice President Harris does not exude confidence nor is she a charismatic public speaker. The legacy and social media outlets are working in overdrive to paper over Harris’ shortcomings. Has the electorate seen through the subterfuge realizing that Harris is artfully dodging interviews and working on weaseling out of next week’s debate because she has trouble thinking on her feet with no props? Harris has been flip-flopping on issues important to the middle class such as immigration, crime and energy because she has been in politics a long time and many of her radical thoughts and actions are on record.

Selected items on the makeover artist pallet:

1. Make Harris the HAPPY candidate effervescing with JOY and HOPE to obscure actual policy and positions.
2. Ignore the fact that Harris could be carrying out her policies right now – President Biden is on a permanent cognitive siesta.
3. Present Harris as a MODERATE and claim some of Trump’s popular ideas as her ideas. Always paint Trump as an unhinged EXTREMIST.
4. Avoid opportunities for unscripted public engagement – debates, town hall meetings, live interviews. Usually, multiple presidential debates occur during an election cycle. Only one debate has been scheduled so far and the debate is on Harris’ home turf. Harris’ CNN interview with her “emotional support governor” was scripted, prerecorded and edited.
5. Harris must not offer any policy proposals that deviate from the new CENTRIST image.
6. Distance Harris from Joe Biden. Create a Harris record devoid of any unpopular Biden Policies. Joe Biden is now President Patsy.
7. Name call Trump – racist, insurrectionist, Russian asset, criminal – non-stop and feel free to lie like a rug. Facts are superfluous; projecting a feel good image for the Democrat Party is key.
8. Refer to abortion as “reproductive rights” and talk about “reproductive rights” ad nauseam. Make sure the Media Lackeys ask Trump “gotcha” abortion questions so that ardent Pro-lifers will punt the Trump and sit the 2024 election out.
9. Bring in a social justice, activist Christian minister for outreach to Christian voters.

Kamala Harris’ Run for the Presidency Looks Like an Oscar Campaign.

Siberhusk

Proposed Tax Increases by Harris Campaign Are a Terrible Idea

Well, well, well, look at my shocked face as Kamala Harris talks about a plan to tax unrealized capital gains and increase the corporate tax rate. “Harris supports the tax increases put forth by Biden in his recent budget proposal. This, according to the Harris’ campaign, includes a 25% tax on unrealized capital gains for individuals with more than $100 million in wealth; and an increased corporate tax rate between 21% and 28%.”  I have to say anytime I see a politician say only soak the rich, I must laugh, we have seen this dog and pony show before. Now will this ever happen, probably not, but the idea is ludicrous. If implemented trust me, it will impact even the little guy like you and me, make no mistake on that. It is theft, a simple money grab to prevent you from becoming wealthy or passing on wealth to your beneficiaries. The unrealized gain measure would have you pay taxes on the increased value of assets like your stock portfolio or your home, even if you did not sell it. Taxing unrealized capital gains is a violation of private property rights and would force people to sell their assets to raise funds to pay the tax. What if the value of the asset goes down later, do you get a refund or a tax credit? Yeah right. Implementing a tax on unrealized capital gains would mean that the government and not the free market would determine the value of your assets.

An unrealized capital gain tax could mean:

  1. Lower investment in the economy, leading to slower economic growth, which could impact job creation and innovation.
  2. Discouraging entrepreneurial activity as entrepreneurs would not be able to pay tax on asset value gains on paper.
  3. Discouraging saving and investing as there could be penalties for holding assets; investments would be in short-term projects or spending now instead of allocating funds to drive investment and growth.
  4. Reducing wealth inequality (make everyone the same), by making hardworking, thrifty, and wise investors poorer, which is what the leftists want.

I must lead off with this epic link:

BACKFIRE: CNBC Hosts Embarrass and Laugh at Harris Economic Advisor When He Pathetically Tries to Sell a Key Part of Her Trillion Tax Plan (VIDEO)

Kamala Harris’s Unrealized Capital Gains Tax Was Already Tried, And It Destroyed the Greatest Empire the World Has Ever Seen

Experts react to Harris’ plan to tax unrealized capital gains: ‘Voodoo economics’

A bad idea back in the day and a bad idea now, even National Review agreed.

Taxing Unrealized Capital Gains Is a Nutty Idea

Why Democrats’ Scheme to Tax Unrealized Capital Gains Should Terrify You

Siberhusk